The State of Antisemitism in Australia
A national snapshot across four dimensions
SENTIMENT. DISCOURSE. INCIDENTS. COMMUNAL PERCEPTION.
Discourse
Discourse captures what people are saying—both in everyday interactions and across online platforms.
Monitoring of Australian digital spaces shows that antisemitic narratives have become a persistent and growing feature of public conversation, particularly since October 2023. What was once confined to the fringes is now appearing more frequently in mainstream spaces.
In 2024–25, more than 620 incidents of verbal abuse were recorded, with Holocaust and Nazi-related discourse often expressed by offenders. These include deeply confronting examples, such as schoolchildren being targeted with Nazi salutes and chants, and students being told to “die in a gas chamber.”
Online antisemitism increased fivefold following October 7, 2023. Importantly, these narratives are not purely reactive—they build on pre-existing ideas that are then amplified by major events. Addressing antisemitism requires tackling these underlying narratives, not just individual incidents.
The Bondi Beach attack emboldened antisemitic actors and triggered a sharp spike in online activity. Online responses to the attack included glorification and justification of the violence, false flag conspiracy theories, and the use of AI-generated content to spread misinformation. A quantitative analysis of antisemitic content found that online antisemitic content increased by more than 470% on the day of the attack, rising further to more than 600% above the baseline the following day.
Monitoring has identified convergence across different groups, with both far-left and far-right actors producing similar antisemitic narratives from different political perspectives.
Four recurring frameworks underpin much of this discourse: accusations of dual loyalty, claims that Jewish organisations act as foreign agents, suggestions that antisemitic incidents are fabricated, and attempts to delegitimise the term “antisemitism” itself.
Language is also evolving. Coded and indirect terms are increasingly used to avoid moderation, including substitutes such as “Zionist”, “globalist”, and other symbols or emojis that carry antisemitic meaning.
Holocaust distortion has also shifted, with a growing trend towards glorification or misuse, rather than outright denial.
Evidence of coordinated online activity has been identified, including near-identical posts appearing across different accounts, suggesting centralised distribution of content and narratives.
Sources
Independent online monitoring reports; social media narrative analysis; hate speech research institutes (2023-2026); narrative monitoring reports using automated and human-reviewed datasets.